Her Father’s Daughter

There are some books that I feel entirely incapable of reviewing. This is one of them.

Here is my review on Goodreads:-
Her Father's DaughterHer Father’s Daughter by Alice Pung

My rating: 5 of 5 stars

Excellent. Shall write a lengthier response on the blog.

***

I finished this in a single sitting, months ago, and I still don’t feel capable of writing anything remotely intelligent or satisfying about it.

Alice Pung writes wonderfully, with so much humour, honesty and vulnerability.  As I read this book, even more so than when I read <a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/92955884>Unpolished Gem, I ached for Alice.  She must hold some of herself back, there must be a private, inaccessible Alice, but her writing is so open, that it seems she laid herself bare.  Vulnerable is exactly the word for her; or, rather, is how I perceive her through her writing.  I wanted to gather her up and defend her.  I wanted to have been her friend when she was a child. She has not had a terrible life; it is full of love and she is fierce in her affections for her family; and best of all, she is doing very well now. She is clearly a strong, brave, independent person; the time she spends alone in Hong Kong and China evidence of that.

But I have this desire to have been her champion when she was a kid. I often have that desire when reading other’s writings about their childhood. I was the kid who fought. I was the kid who befriended the newbie, defended the weak, took taunts and threw punches. I don’t really know why I was that kid. My mother spent a lot of her time telling me to be submissive and not to argue. I didn’t listen to her. I always talked back. I don’t know if it is because there were so many people in my family; I always knew someone had my back if I went roaring into a fight.

It is a great talent on Alice Pung’s part that she can elicit these strong feelings from me. I’ve seen her out and about in Melbourne, and I feel protective of her; so protective, that I don’t actually feel comfortable wandering over and saying, “Hi, I’m Oanh. I like your writing lots. Thanks.” I want to, but I think that she would prefer to be left alone.

This isn’t a review, really. It’s just a ramble about how it makes me feel; not even a particularly coherent one, sorry. The book speaks for itself; just read it. I liked it a lot.

The Bureaucracy

I have been filling out forms, lately.

I am terrible at filling out forms. Especially important ones that relate to me. I am very good at filling out forms for other people. After all a lot of my daily work involves form filling. (The life of a lawyer is a glamorous one, my friends.) From when I was young, I filled out forms for my parents and translated for them: Social Security forms, mortgage forms, citizenship application forms, medical forms. You name it and I have probably filled it out.

The form currently occupying my time is my “Becoming a UK Lawyer” form. It has more illegible crossings out on it than any I have filled in so far. I peer at the question and think: What do you mean? Does that apply to me? I recall having similar difficulties when applying to become an Australian lawyer. Perhaps it is the last way the system can weed out the unsuitables: If you cannot fill out this form, buddy, you’re probably not cut out to be a lawyer.

The section on forms in the UK that bother me the most are the ‘diversity’ questions. A limp appendage to the rest of the form, this part comes last. There is a tick box (yes/no) for whether one has a disability and then a blank space where one can be artful in the description of one’s deviation from the able-bodied world. Next, is my favourite question:

Please describe your ethnic background.

Instead of a few blank lines, like the disability question, there are 8 or so tick boxes.

They are:-

1. White / Irish
2. White / British
3. Indian
4. Pakistani
5. Bangladeshi
6. Chinese
7. Mixed Race
8. White / Other

I am flummoxed by these choices. I am exceedingly reluctant to tick the “White / Other ” box. So I don’t. I’m not white. But I do fit into a lot of ‘Other’ categories. Instead, I write in the empty space: Vietnamese. There, I am recognised. That part of my form will probably just be discarded as it cannot be inputted into a database and will therefore count as “no response”.

I love the Mixed Race choice. You just tick it and then there’s nowhere for you to say what mixture. It is as if, once you are a mongrel, the ethnic heritages that go to make up YOU are irrelevant. Mixed Race is a category of itself. And perhaps it is: an additional layer that is more than its composite parts. Nevertheless, I expect the parts that make up the whole are important to the individual. Important enough to be put on a form, anyway.

Ghosts – A film review

This is an excellently made film, telling a very sad story.

I think the IMDB plot precis is quite amusing: “A young Chinese girl is smuggled into the UK so she can support her son and family in China” and it does not, by any stretch of the imagination, capture what the film is actually about.

The film is a fictionalised drama based on actual events that some of the actors, including the lead “young Chinese girl”, experienced. The official website has a better synopsis, but still calls the lead a “young Chinese girl”. I don’t mean to go off topic, but honestly, the lead – Ai Qin – has a young son – aged about 3/4 years (but maybe older as she takes him to school) when she leaves China at the beginning of the movie – and about 5/6 years at the end of the movie. She can’t be a girl. She just can’t. (here I stamp my feet – that’s how good my argument is)

Ghosts is about Chinese illegal immigrants in the UK, brought sharply and shockingly into the news when 23 Chinese illegal immigrants drowned while cockle picking in Morecambe Bay on 5 February 2004.

The film opens with a van full of Chinese people, driving across a grey beach, they pick cockles and the water swirls around them until all are stranded atop the van, dark waves menancingly rocking the van side to side. A shivering few use a mobile phone to call their family, and the “young Chinese girl” sings a song to her son, which segues us to the beginning of the story. We follow Ai Qin from her negotiation of her fare and passage in China, through her six month smuggled transit to UK and then in her housing and factory and farming jobs with a fake work permit, culminating in her work cockle-picking and its fatal consequences. These Chinese immigrants have indebted themselves to their smugglers, and must work to pay back their debt, send money home and cover the cost – usually exhorbitant – of their accommodation. At the end of the film, we are told that many of the families of the Morecambe Bay victims are still repaying their debts, and there is a fund that one can donate to, to assist the repayment.

There are a lot of illegal immigrants in the UK. At the moment, there seem to be a lot of concern about Polish immigrants. The newspapers reported recently that there were probably twice as many Polish immigrants in the UK than the authorities were aware of.

The use of the term “illegal immigrant” is interesting of itself. The people depicted in Ghosts are not, to my mind, illegal immigrants. They are trafficked persons. They have been misled, misinformed and are treated as no more than commodities; this is neatly symbolised by their passage inside the hull of a shipping container. They are exploited by the persons who have brought them to the UK, and by the persons who ‘look after’ them in the UK. I was very impressed with Nick Bloomfield’s representation of Mr Lin – the head of the Chinese workers that the lead character is placed with. He is exploiter – but he, too, has his own difficulties in the UK. He swaggers when we see him first, but his eyes cloud over and his shoulders droop as he struggles to find work for himself and his fellow immigrants.

The film touches upon a number of issues, which provides a real-ness to the experience of Ai Qin. There is racism, of course, but there are also moments of fun and camaraderie: although I am not so persuaded that a day apple-picking is actually fun. Racism is depicted in many forms: from the mundanity of Ai Qin’s fake work permit bearing the picture of a another Chinese woman, to the neighbours who spit on the ground as the Chinese immigrants walk past, to the group of English cockle-pickers who assault the Chinese immigrants for picking in “their spot”. The film title is also apt – and with myriad interpretations: coould it refer to what the Chinese immigrants themselves call white English people, or does it refer to their unseen status as illegal immigrants?

Underlining Ai Qin’s precarious position is the constant threat / offer of prostitution. There is another woman in the illegal immigrant household: she is Mr Lin’s lover and she does not like manual work. She may also be the lover of the white English landlord, who comes by in a doof-doof car, with swinging gold chains to collect the rent (in cash of course). She giggles and pouts, in a cheong sam, on his lap at a party. You wonder who is exploiting whom in this interchange, and how neither of them will budge any stereotypes about the other.

There is also the very interesting depiction of the inhumanity behind factory processed meat: Ai Qin works in Sainsbury’s packing duck and maybe chicken too. Ai Qin is not involved at the killing stage, but even the treatment of the duck meat is disturbing. It is strange to use the term ‘inhumane’ because the animal is not, obviously, a human and yet it is inhumane treatment. The duck meat is no more than a commodity, and it is mass produced. I am not articulating myself very well here, about this. I have long been concerned about the mass production of meat, the way the end product is so divorced from its living reality. The mass production of food leads to inhumane conditions for the humans involved in the production, and for the animals, too. This is another blog post, however.

Not long after I saw this movie, I read an article in the newspaper about Vietnamese illegal immigrants who worked inside homes owned by Vietnamese gangs looking after crops of cannabis.

Two things leapt out at me when reading this article. The first was the awareness that the poor illegal immigrant (probably trafficked person) left to mind the crop would be the one who took any punishment meted out. The second was this paragraph:

The police have become so concerned about the criminal gang connection that they have warned landlords and letting agencies of the dangers of renting property to apparently innocent Vietnamese people.

In fairness to the article, the following paragraph warns about potential breach of anti-racism laws. But that’s a bit scare-mongering, isn’t it? Yes – there are Viet gangs in London (and probably elsewhere) producing drugs. But you know, some of those apparently innocent Vietnamese people are innocent Vietnamese people. And some of those apparently guilty Vietnamese people, like the people the subject of Ghosts are not as culpable in their own misfortune as they would appear.